Gct code coverage download

We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime. Next SlideShares. You are reading a preview. Create your free account to continue reading. Sign Up. Upcoming SlideShare. Lesson PPT 1. Embed Size px. Start on. Show related SlideShares at end.

WordPress Shortcode. Share Email. Top clipped slide. Download Now Download Download to read offline. Tools and techniques of code coverage testing Download Now Download Download to read offline. Journal Publishing. Code coverage analysis in testing. Code Coverage. Code coverage. Software Testing. Whitebox testing. White box testing. Comparing model coverage and code coverage in Model Driven testing: an explor Related Books Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd.

Uncommon Carriers John McPhee. The Art of War Sun Tsu. Related Audiobooks Free with a 30 day trial from Scribd. Elizabeth Howell. Views Total views. Actions Shares. No notes for slide. Tools and techniques of code coverage testing 1. Code coverage analysis provides a measure of how much source is being covered by test execution. The completeness of Software testing can be measured by requirement coverage, structural coverage, and architectural coverage.

This paper focus on techniques of structural coverage testing that is also known as code coverage testing. The code coverage testing includes the statement coverage, path coverage, function coverage and condition coverage.

The code coverage analysis can be done by some special analysis tools are known as code coverage tools. This paper also present some commonly used coverage analysis tools based on some coverage criteria, this may help to select particular code coverage tool. Testing is the process of executing a program with the intent of finding error [1].

The code coverage metrics provide how much code of program has been tested. Code coverage metrics are used to determine the percentage of source code covered by testing. Code coverage testing is a method of designing and executing test cases and finding out the percentage of source code covered by testing. If a better coverage of code is required, several iteration of testing may be required, for each iteration tester has to check the statistics and write a new set of test cases for the section of code that is not covered by the earlier test cases [4].

To do this type of testing tester need to understand the program code and logic but also need to understand how to write effective test cases. The automated and specialized tools are designed to monitor and keep records of what portions of code covered by the testing, and what portion is not covered [6].

To achieve maximum coverage the code coverage testing involves following types of coverage. Path Coverage 2. For a section of code that consists of statements that are sequentially executed, test cases can be designed to run through each statement at least once from top to bottom. However, this may not always be true. For example while testing exception like divide by zero encounters, and then the test cases may not cover all the statements.

As we know most of the defects in a program due to the loops. One of the common looping errors is that termination condition of the loop not properly stated. Basically loops can be define in four types 4. Skip loop entirely, so that the situation of the termination condition true before starting the loop is tested. Start at inner most loop.

Set all other loops to minimum values. Conduct simple loop test for the inner most loop, while holding the outer loop at minimum iteration parameters.

Add other tests for out of range or excluded the values. Continue until all loops have been tested. If each loop is independent from other loop, loops can be tested using simple loop method.

If two loops are concatenated and the loop counts for loop 1, is used as the initial value for loop 2, then the loops are not independent, in this situation nested loop testing method can be applied. In path coverage testing, we split a program into a number of distinct paths [5]. We identify the number of independent paths in a program.

An independent path through the program that introduces at least one new set of processing statements or new condition [1]. If we design the test cases for each independent path, it will increase code coverage.

Functions are directly related to user requirement to the test coverage of the product. It Remove redundant test cases from a test suite to reduce regression testing effort significantly without decreasing testing effectiveness.

It provides reports of program elements which were not executed. Any metrics which existed in 1. Skip to content. Star Branches Tags. Could not load branches. Could not load tags. Latest commit. Git stats commits. Failed to load latest commit information. SeqLib 35c9ec5. View code. Mates beyond this distance will be counted as chimeric pairs.

Requires the --bed argument. Reads below this number are excluded from coverage metrics. Reads with more than this number of mismatches are excluded from coverage metrics. A positive value shifts the 3' and 5' windows towards eachother, while a negative value shifts them apart.

Genes below this size are ignored in the calculation. Default: [bp] --legacy Use legacy counting rules. Only features on the same strand of a read will be considered. Allowed values are 'RF', 'rf', 'FR', and 'fr' -v, --verbose Give some feedback about what's going on. Supply this argument twice for progress updates while parsing the bam -t[TAG Defaults to 'ch' for STAR --exclude-chimeric Exclude chimeric reads from the read counts -u, --unpaired Allow unpaired reads to be quantified.