Influenza virus size nm

Journal List J Exp Med v. J Exp Med. Author information Article notes Copyright and License information Disclaimer. Received Nov 3. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. At times the virus activity appeared to sediment at a rate comparable with that of particles about 80 to mmicro in diameter, at other times at a rate comparable with that of particles about 10 mmicro in diameter, and at still other times the bulk of the activity appeared to sediment at a rate comparable with that of the larger particles and the residual activity at a rate comparable with that of the smaller particles.

However, in the presence of a sucrose density gradient, the virus activity was always found to sediment with a rate comparable to that of particles about 80 to mmicro in diameter; hence it appeared that the variable sedimentation behavior in dilute electrolyte solution was due to convection or mechanical disturbances during centrifugation.

Received Mar 27; Accepted Mar This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Abstract The COVID pandemic is a harsh reminder of the fact that, whether in a single human host or a wave of infection across continents, viral dynamics is often a story about the numbers.

Research organism: Human. Introduction The COVID pandemic has made brutally clear the need for further research into many aspects of viruses.

Open in a separate window. Figure 1. How long does it take a single infected person to yield one million infected people? What is the effect of physical distancing? Why was the initial quarantine period two weeks? What can we learn from the mutation rate of the virus? How stable and infectious is the virion on surfaces? Definitions and measurement methods What are the meanings of R 0 , 'latent period' and 'infectious period'? What is the difference between measurements of viral RNA and infectious viruses?

What is the difference between the case fatality rate and the infection fatality rate? What is the burst size and the replication time of the virus?

Box 1. Glossary Clinical measures Incubation period : time between exposure and symptoms. Epidemiological inferences R 0 : the average number of cases directly generated by an individual infection. Latent period: time between exposure and becoming infective. Infectious period: time for which an individual is infective. Viral life-cycle Eclipse period: time between viral entry and appearance of intracellular virions.

Virion : a viral particle. Human biology Alveolar macrophage: immune cells found in the lung that engulf foreign material like dust and microbes 'professional phagocytes'. Pneumocytes: the non-immune cells in the lung. Are people usually diagnosed before or after they are contagious? Sources of the numbers in Figure 1 Note that for about 10 out of 45 parameters, the literature values are from other coronaviruses.

Size and content Diameter. Using diameter and assuming the virus is a sphere. Genome Type. Host cells Type. Concentration Nasopharynx, throat, stool, and sputum. Antibody response — seroconversion Seroconversion time time period until a specific antibody becomes detectable in the blood.

Virus environmental stability Half-life on surfaces. Funding Statement The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. Additional information Competing interests No competing interests declared.

Additional files Supplementary file 1. Click here to view. Data availability This article is a compilation of previously published data; no new data were generated in this study. References Cavanagh D.

Coronavirus IBV: further evidence that the surface projections are associated with two glycopolypeptides. Journal of General Virology. The Lancet Microbe. Effect of route of inoculation on experimental respiratory viral disease in volunteers and evidence for airborne transmission. Bacteriological Reviews. Lung volumes in healthy nonsmoking adults. Bulletin Europeen De Physiopathologie Respiratoire.

Organization of two transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus membrane protein topologies within the virion and core. Journal of Virology. Morphometric characterisation of the fine structure of human type II pneumocytes. The Anatomical Record. Imperial College; Characterizations of particle size distribution of the droplets exhaled by sneeze. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. Nature Medicine. Structural proteins of human respiratory coronavirus OC Virus Research.

Report on the Task Group on Reference Man. Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press; Viral shedding and transmission potential of asymptomatic and paucisymptomatic influenza virus infections in the community. Physical interventions to interrupt or reduce the spread of respiratory viruses: systematic review. Journal of Korean Medical Science. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. The incubation period of coronavirus disease COVID From publicly reported confirmed cases: estimation and application.

Annals of Internal Medicine. Respiratory virus shedding in exhaled breath and efficacy of face masks. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of novel coronavirus-infected pneumonia. New England Journal of Medicine. Association of the infectious bronchitis virus 3c protein with the virion envelope. Cell number and distribution in human and rat airways. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report.

A structural analysis of M protein in coronavirus assembly and morphology. Journal of Structural Biology. Early events of SARS coronavirus infection in vero cells. Journal of Medical Virology. The rate of underascertainment of novel coronavirus nCoV Infection: estimation using Japanese passengers data on evacuation flights. Journal of Clinical Medicine. Mild and moderate asthma is associated with airway goblet cell Hyperplasia and abnormalities in mucin gene expression.

The Lancet Infectious Diseases. Reconciling early-outbreak estimates of the basic reproductive number and its uncertainty: framework and applications to the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 outbreak. OSF Preprints. A comparison of facemask and respirator filtration test methods.

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene. Estimating the infection and case fatality ratio for coronavirus disease COVID using age-adjusted data from the outbreak on the Diamond Princess cruise ship, February Viral mutation rates. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus replication is severely impaired by MG due to proteasome-independent inhibition of M-calpain.

Immunohistochemical, in situ hybridization, and ultrastructural localization of SARS-associated coronavirus in lung of a fatal case of severe acute respiratory syndrome in Taiwan.

Human Pathology. Implications of altered replication fidelity on the evolution and pathogenesis of coronaviruses. Current Opinion in Virology. Allometric relationships of cell numbers and size in the mammalian lung. Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary. BMC Infectious Diseases. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV an observational cohort study.

The Lancet. Additionally, there is debate over airborne transmission and what kind of PPE healthcare workers should don in these situations where exposure is imminent.

Editor's note: This is part 1 of a two-part series examining viral size, transmission of disease, and implications for respiratory protection worn by healthcare workers. As Lindsley and Blachere, et al. The likelihood of the airborne transmission of influenza virus by infectious aerosols is particularly unclear, with some investigators concluding that airborne transmission is a key route, while others maintain that it rarely, if ever, occurs.

The question of airborne transmission is especially important in healthcare facilities, where influenza patients tend to congregate during influenza season, because it directly impacts the infection control and personal protective measures that should be taken by healthcare workers. During the H1N1 pandemic, for example, a United States Institute of Medicine IOM panel recommended that healthcare workers in close contact with influenza patients wear respirators to avoid infectious aerosols.

The IOM panel also noted that many questions about the airborne transmission of influenza are unresolved, and the issue remains controversial.

One recent study published in the Journal of Infectious Diseases suggests that patients with influenza can emit small virus-containing particles into the surrounding air during routine patient care, potentially exposing healthcare providers to influenza. Published in The, the findings raise the possibility that current influenza infection control recommendations may not always be adequate to protect providers from influenza during routine patient care in hospitals. Werner E. Study participants had been admitted to the emergency department 52 patients or an inpatient care unit 42 patients of Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, where vaccination for influenza is mandatory for healthcare providers.

Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from each patient. Samples were analyzed by rapid testing and by PCR analysis. Air samples were obtained by placing three six-stage air samplers from within 1 foot, 3 feet, and 6 feet of patients. No aerosol-generating proceduressuch as bronchoscopy, sputum induction, intubation, or cardiopulmonary resuscitationwere conducted while air sampling took place. During air sampling, the number of patients coughs and sneezes were counted and assessed for severity.

Patients also completed a questionnaire at admission to report symptoms and the number of days they were sick. Of the 94 patients enrolled, 61 patients 65 percent tested positive for influenza virus. Twenty-six 43 percent released influenza virus into the air. Five patients 19 percent emitted up to 32 times more virus than others.

This group of patients with influenza, described by the researchers as super-emitters, suggested that some patients may be more likely to transmit influenza than others. High concentration of influenza virus released into the air was associated with high viral loads in nasopharyngeal samples. Patients who emitted more virus also reported greater severity of illness. The current belief is that influenza virus is spread primarily by large particles traveling up to a maximum of 3 feet to 6 feet from an infected person.

Recommended precautions for health providers focus on preventing transmission by large droplets and following special instructions during aerosol-generating procedures.

In this study, Bischoff and his team discovered that the majority of influenza virus in the air samples analyzed was found in small particles during non-aerosol-generating activities up to a 6-foot distance from the patients head, and that concentrations of virus decreased with distance.

The study addressed only the presence of influenza-containing particles near patients during routine care, not the actual transmission of influenza infection to others.

As Bischoff, et al. CDC and WHO state that influenza virus transmission primarily occurs by large-particle respiratory droplets traveling within a short distance of the source and that such particles are blocked during encounters between patients and healthcare professionals HCPs by face masks worn by HCP. During routine, non-aerosol-generating patient care, the current precautions recommend that providers wear a non-fitted face mask.

The researchers add, "The size of airborne particles determines how influenza virus is transmitted. Notably, no aerosol-generating procedures were undertaken during air sampling.

The predominance of small particles has been reported previously, with influenza virus detected in the exhaled breath of 4 of 12 subjects 33 percent breathing normally. The effect of coughing was studied in 47 influenza viruspositive patients.

The published data and our findings indicate that small particles carry the majority of influenza virus other than virus released during aerosol-generating procedures. We consider it unlikely that, during routine care, influenza virus is transmitted solely by droplet-sized particles. These findings suggest that current infection control recommendations may need to be reevaluated, the study authors say.

Another recent study suggests that people may more likely be exposed to the flu through airborne virus than previously thought, according to new research from the University of Maryland School of Public Health. The study also found that when flu patients wear a surgical mask, the release of virus in even the smallest airborne droplets can be significantly reduced. Routes of flu transmission include: 1 direct or indirect e.